Yes We Should: Research Assessment in the Humanities (2024)

van den Akker, W. J. (2016). Yes We Should: Research Assessment in the Humanities. In M. Ochsner, S. E. Hug, & H.-D. Daniel (Eds.), Research assessment in the humanities: Towards criteria and procedures (pp. 23-29). (Springer Open). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4_3

van den Akker, W.J. / Yes We Should : Research Assessment in the Humanities. Research assessment in the humanities: Towards criteria and procedures. editor / Micahel Ochsner ; Sven E. Hug ; Hans-Dieter Daniel. Switzerland : Springer, 2016. pp. 23-29 (Springer Open).

@inbook{74c1c0beb75747f79745d579455a11a7,

title = "Yes We Should: Research Assessment in the Humanities",

abstract = "In this contribution I argue that the Humanities, just like any other maturefield of knowledge, should have or develop a system by which its research can beassessed. In a world that increasingly asks for justification of public funds, wherepublic money becomes scarcer, so that less amounts have to be distributed amongmoreplayers,whereresearchfundsarebeingconcentratedanddistributedonahighlycompetitive basis, we as humanists cannot shy away from research assessment withtheargumentthat{\textquoteleft}wearedifferentfromtherest{\textquoteright}orthat{\textquoteleft}wedon{\textquoteright}tneedit{\textquoteright}.Ofcoursethe humanities are a distinct member of the body of academic knowledge, but thatholds true for every discipline. If we agree that for instance that bibliometry doesnot suit most players in our field, the question becomes: what will suit us better?Case-studies? This contribution also contains a warning: let us stop arguing aboutthe language issue. English is the modern Latin of academia and its use enables us tocommunicate with one another, wherever we are or who we are. Without providingdefinite solutions, my argument isthat we, humanists, should take the steering wheelourselves in developing adequate forms of research assessment. If we leave it toothers, the humanities will look like arms attached to a foot.",

keywords = "Research Assessment, Defence mechanisms humanities, Not different, Possibilities-pitfalls, Language and nationalism",

author = "{van den Akker}, W.J.",

year = "2016",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4_3",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-3-319-29014-0",

series = "Springer Open",

publisher = "Springer",

pages = "23--29",

editor = "Micahel Ochsner and Hug, {Sven E.} and Hans-Dieter Daniel",

booktitle = "Research assessment in the humanities",

}

van den Akker, WJ 2016, Yes We Should: Research Assessment in the Humanities. in M Ochsner, SE Hug & H-D Daniel (eds), Research assessment in the humanities: Towards criteria and procedures. Springer Open, Springer, Switzerland, pp. 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4_3

Yes We Should: Research Assessment in the Humanities. / van den Akker, W.J.
Research assessment in the humanities: Towards criteria and procedures. ed. / Micahel Ochsner; Sven E. Hug; Hans-Dieter Daniel. Switzerland: Springer, 2016. p. 23-29 (Springer Open).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Academic › peer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Yes We Should

T2 - Research Assessment in the Humanities

AU - van den Akker, W.J.

PY - 2016/4

Y1 - 2016/4

N2 - In this contribution I argue that the Humanities, just like any other maturefield of knowledge, should have or develop a system by which its research can beassessed. In a world that increasingly asks for justification of public funds, wherepublic money becomes scarcer, so that less amounts have to be distributed amongmoreplayers,whereresearchfundsarebeingconcentratedanddistributedonahighlycompetitive basis, we as humanists cannot shy away from research assessment withtheargumentthat‘wearedifferentfromtherest’orthat‘wedon’tneedit’.Ofcoursethe humanities are a distinct member of the body of academic knowledge, but thatholds true for every discipline. If we agree that for instance that bibliometry doesnot suit most players in our field, the question becomes: what will suit us better?Case-studies? This contribution also contains a warning: let us stop arguing aboutthe language issue. English is the modern Latin of academia and its use enables us tocommunicate with one another, wherever we are or who we are. Without providingdefinite solutions, my argument isthat we, humanists, should take the steering wheelourselves in developing adequate forms of research assessment. If we leave it toothers, the humanities will look like arms attached to a foot.

AB - In this contribution I argue that the Humanities, just like any other maturefield of knowledge, should have or develop a system by which its research can beassessed. In a world that increasingly asks for justification of public funds, wherepublic money becomes scarcer, so that less amounts have to be distributed amongmoreplayers,whereresearchfundsarebeingconcentratedanddistributedonahighlycompetitive basis, we as humanists cannot shy away from research assessment withtheargumentthat‘wearedifferentfromtherest’orthat‘wedon’tneedit’.Ofcoursethe humanities are a distinct member of the body of academic knowledge, but thatholds true for every discipline. If we agree that for instance that bibliometry doesnot suit most players in our field, the question becomes: what will suit us better?Case-studies? This contribution also contains a warning: let us stop arguing aboutthe language issue. English is the modern Latin of academia and its use enables us tocommunicate with one another, wherever we are or who we are. Without providingdefinite solutions, my argument isthat we, humanists, should take the steering wheelourselves in developing adequate forms of research assessment. If we leave it toothers, the humanities will look like arms attached to a foot.

KW - Research Assessment

KW - Defence mechanisms humanities

KW - Not different

KW - Possibilities-pitfalls

KW - Language and nationalism

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4_3

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4_3

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-319-29014-0

T3 - Springer Open

SP - 23

EP - 29

BT - Research assessment in the humanities

A2 - Ochsner, Micahel

A2 - Hug, Sven E.

A2 - Daniel, Hans-Dieter

PB - Springer

CY - Switzerland

ER -