CFPB Orders U.S. Bank to Pay $21 Million for Illegal Conduct During COVID-19 Pandemic | Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (2024)

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) today ordered U.S. Bank to pay nearly $21 million for keeping out-of-work consumers from accessing unemployment benefits at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. U.S. Bank froze tens of thousands of accounts. However, it failed to provide people a reliable and quick way to regain access. The bank also failed to provide provisional account credits, while investigating potentially unauthorized transfers. Today’s order requires U.S. Bank to pay $5.7 million to consumers harmed by its actions and to pay a $15 million penalty.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) separately fined U.S. Bank $15 million. The CFPB and OCC coordinated during their investigations into U.S. Bank’s illegal conduct.

“At a time when unemployment was close to 15%, many out-of-work Americans throughout the country had little choice but to rely on U.S. Bank for their unemployment benefits. U.S. Bank blocked access to accounts and demanded burdensome paperwork in order for consumers to regain access to their frozen benefits," said CFPB Director Rohit Chopra. “U.S. Bank must comply with the law, and the CFPB and OCC are making the bank pay for its conduct.”

U.S. Bank is a wholly-owned subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp (NYSE: USB). It is based in Minneapolis. The bank is the fifth-largest commercial bank in the country, with 2,000 branches in 26 states. As of September 30, 2023, U.S. Bank had $668 billion in assets.

At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, U.S. Bank had contracts with at least 19 states and the District of Columbia to deliver unemployment benefits. Millions of newly out-of-work consumers relied on the unemployment benefits delivered through U.S. Bank’s ReliaCard prepaid card. However, tens of thousands of those consumers found their accounts frozen for weeks or more at a time. Consumers had to verify their identities to unfreeze their accounts, but the bank lacked an adequate way for them to do so. Many of other consumers found U.S. Bank failed to provide them provisional account credits after they reported unauthorized transfers from their accounts.

The CFPB found that U.S. Bank violated the Consumer Financial Protection Act and the Electronic Fund Transfer Act. Specifically, the bank harmed consumers by withholding:

  • Access to state benefits: Expanded anti-fraud controls, implemented by U.S. Bank, resulted in tens of thousands of frozen accounts. However, U.S. Bank did not provide consistent, accurate instructions to consumers on how to unfreeze their accounts quickly. That left consumers unable to access unemployment funds.
  • Provisional account credits: When accountholders report unauthorized transfers, banks must provide provisional account credits if their investigations take more than 10 days. In thousands of cases, U.S. Bank failed to provide provisional credits. The bank failed to provide the credits because it improperly required additional written confirmation about the suspected unauthorized transfers from consumers. These actions left consumers unable to spend the funds they had reported as unauthorized transfers.

Enforcement Action

Under the Consumer Financial Protection Act, the CFPB has the authority to take action against institutions violating consumer financial protection laws, including engaging in unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices. It also has the authority to take action against institutions for violating the Electronic Fund Transfer Act. The CFPB’s order requires U.S. Bank to:

  • Pay $5.7 million to consumers: U.S. Bank is required to provide redress to the tens of thousands of consumers harmed by the bank’s administration failures.
  • Provide consumers access to their unemployment funds: The order set guardrails on how U.S. Bank can limit consumer access to unemployment benefit account funds. The bank must have adequate processes to help consumers regain access.
  • Issue provisional account credits: Consumers who submit a notice of error online will not have to submit additional, written confirmation about an unauthorized electronic transfer to receive provisional account credits.
  • Pay a $15 million fine: U.S. Bank will pay a $15 million penalty to the CFPB’s victims relief fund.

Read the CFPB’s order.

Read the CFPB’s 2022 action against U.S. Bank. In its previous action against the bank, the CFPB fined U.S. Bank $37.5 million for illegally accessing its customers’ credit reports and opening checking and savings accounts, credit cards, and lines of credit without customers’ permission.

Read the CFPB’s 2022 action against Bank of America.The CFPB and OCC together fined Bank of America $225 million for botching the disbursem*nt of state unemployment benefits at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Consumers can submit complaints about financial products and services by visiting the CFPB’s website or by calling (855) 411-CFPB (2372).

Employees who believe their companies have violated federal consumer financial protection laws are encouraged to send information about what they know to whistleblower@cfpb.gov. To learn more about reporting potential industry misconduct, visit the CFPB’s website.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is a 21st century agency that implements and enforces Federal consumer financial law and ensures that markets for consumer financial products are fair, transparent, and competitive. For more information, visit www.consumerfinance.gov.

CFPB Orders U.S. Bank to Pay $21 Million for Illegal Conduct During COVID-19 Pandemic | Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (2024)

FAQs

CFPB Orders U.S. Bank to Pay $21 Million for Illegal Conduct During COVID-19 Pandemic | Consumer Financial Protection Bureau? ›

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) today ordered U.S. Bank to pay nearly $21 million for keeping out-of-work consumers from accessing unemployment benefits at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. U.S. Bank froze tens of thousands of accounts.

Is U.S. Bank slapped with million dollar fines for illegal conduct? ›

As a result of the CFPB's findings during its investigation, the bank is forced by the bureau to pay $5.7 million to consumers who were negatively affected by the its actions. U.S. Bank is also being hit with a $15 million penalty which will go to the CFPB's victims relief fund.

What did the U.S. Bank get in trouble for? ›

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) took action against U.S. Bank for illegally accessing its customers' credit reports and opening checking and savings accounts, credit cards, and lines of credit without customers' permission.

Is the U.S. Bank in trouble? ›

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau says the Minneapolis-based bank failed to provide consumers access to unemployment benefits at the height of the pandemic. One of the largest banks in the nation is in trouble with the federal government over its conduct with consumers during the height of the Covid-19 pandemic.

What is the CFPB open banking rule? ›

The CFPB's Proposed Rule regarding Personal Financial Data Rights marks a significant step toward open banking in the United States. This innovative approach promises to empower consumers with control over their financial data and to foster competition in the industry.

Is U.S. Bank paying $36 million for illegal pandemic conduct? ›

WASHINGTON, Dec 19 (Reuters) - U.S. Bank <USB. N> will pay $36 million over allegations the company illegally blocked out-of-work consumers from accessing unemployment benefits during the coronavirus pandemic, top federal banking regulators announced on Tuesday.

Why is U.S. Bank getting sued? ›

The suit, initially filed in California state court in November, claims U.S. Bank has been requiring all customers or users of its website and mobile applications to agree to a digital service agreement that stifles their rights to free speech and the right of California residents to hear "lawful discourse."

Who owns U.S. Bank? ›

U.S. Bancorp is a publicly traded company owned by its shareholders. Four of its five top shareholders in early 2024 were large asset management companies (Vanguard Group, BlackRock, State Street, and JPMorgan).

Which president wanted to destroy the Bank of the United States? ›

The Bank War was a political struggle that developed over the issue of rechartering the Second Bank of the United States (B.U.S.) during the presidency of Andrew Jackson (1829–1837). The affair resulted in the shutdown of the Bank and its replacement by state banks.

How many US banks have failed? ›

Since the establishment of the FDIC in 1934, there have been 3,516 bank failures in the United States.

Why is U.S. Bank closing so many banks? ›

“Banks have recognized that their physical footprint does not need to be as large today,” says Nathan Stovall, head of financial institutions research, at S&P Global Market Intelligence. “As revenue pressures persist, banks likely will continue to shrink branch networks.”

What bank is failing in 2024? ›

The news: Last Friday, Pennsylvania financial regulators seized and shut down Philadelphia-based Republic First Bank in the first FDIC-insured bank failure of 2024.

Which four banks are in trouble? ›

About the FDIC:
Bank NameBankCityCityClosing DateClosing
First Republic BankSan FranciscoMay 1, 2023
Signature BankNew YorkMarch 12, 2023
Silicon Valley BankSanta ClaraMarch 10, 2023
Almena State BankAlmenaOctober 23, 2020
55 more rows
Apr 26, 2024

What is the $3000 bank rule? ›

The regulation requires that multiple purchases during one business day be aggregated and treated as one purchase. Purchases of different types of instruments at the same time are treated as one purchase and the amounts should be aggregated to determine if the total is $3,000 or more.

What is the 1033 rule? ›

Section 1033 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act states that, “[s]ubject to rules prescribed by the Bureau, a covered person shall make available to a consumer, upon request, information in the control or possession of the covered person concerning the consumer financial product or service ...

Does the CFPB have jurisdiction over banks? ›

The CFPB supervises a range of companies to assess their compliance with federal consumer financial laws. We have supervisory authority over banks, thrifts, and credit unions with assets over $10 billion, as well as their affiliates.

What was the biggest AML penalty paid by bank in US? ›

1. Standard Chartered fined $1.1 billion. In 2019, Standard Chartered Bank was fined $1.1 billion by US and UK authorities for violating anti-money laundering regulations.

What is the maximum fine for breach of US sanctions? ›

BAT agreed to settle with OFAC for $508 million (the statutory maximum and OFAC's largest-ever penalty against a non-financial institution), $503 million of which was satisfied by its $629 million resolution with DOJ (the largest criminal North Korean sanctions penalty ever imposed by DOJ).

Did U.S. Bank fine $36 million for frozen unemployment benefits? ›

U.S. Bancorp will pay $36 million to settle regulators' claims that it improperly kept unemployed Americans from easily accessing benefits through assistance programs at the peak of the Covid-19 pandemic.

What top US banks are under investigation? ›

Bank of America, Chase, U.S. Bank, Wells Fargo, Citi Bank and Truist were already being targeted in the probe looking to expose how the U.S. Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and the FBI worked together.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Rueben Jacobs

Last Updated:

Views: 6243

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (77 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Rueben Jacobs

Birthday: 1999-03-14

Address: 951 Caterina Walk, Schambergerside, CA 67667-0896

Phone: +6881806848632

Job: Internal Education Planner

Hobby: Candle making, Cabaret, Poi, Gambling, Rock climbing, Wood carving, Computer programming

Introduction: My name is Rueben Jacobs, I am a cooperative, beautiful, kind, comfortable, glamorous, open, magnificent person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.